Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

3

zod wrote

It has been taken over by the far right, that's for sure.

3

Die_Bienen wrote

Wait has it really? That's a shame :/

2

Defasher wrote

reddit has, r/anarchism hasn't yet - the admins are fucking with them for opposing fascism and banning all the anarchist mods from the site for nonsensical reasons.

r/antifa is modded by open fascists.

2

ziq wrote

The admins banned all the most active mods to kill the sub.

0

[deleted] wrote

4

ziq wrote

A question for the admins here: Are gender critical and anti prostitution perspectives allowed on this site? Would I be banned for posting radical feminist material?

'Radical feminist' material isn't transphobic. But if you're talking about TERF shit, it's not welcome in any safe space. Anti prostitution - that depends on if you're attacking the sex worker or the conditions they suffer.

1

[deleted] wrote

4

emma wrote (edited )

BORN TO DIE

WORLD IS A FUCK

鬼神 Kill Em All 1989

I am trash man

410,757,864,530 DEAD COPS

3

ziq wrote

It's odd that this needs to be spelled out to people.

1

tanattyn wrote

You or someone appointed lutherblissett as a mod to at least one sub. And on top of having a user that's literally Luther Bless It, they have said some outrageously TWEF/SWEFy things like, I think "intersectionality" is bourgeois postmodern liberal crap; implying they agree with the Nordic Model, two. They spent an entire paragraph elaborating how much they hate me as a trans woman, because I suggested violence was even theoretically a solution to patriarchy. And finally them and KarlMarx teamed up, two, to pathologize my anger at racist, sexist "idpol is why (white men) don't have socialism" shit, and being sexually harassed today on raddit. Ofc the post has been deleted, so, fuck me.

I'm fucking done with this, farce, online and IRL, where one has to be perfectly polite and take every insult and injury from white cis/trans able males, oftentimes upper/middle-class, with a smile, so long as they claim to be leftists/anarchists. Or I just, don't have non-liberal friends, at all. I'll die a shutin before that. I really actually will.

2

ziq wrote

You or someone appointed lutherblissett as a mod

Anyone that creates a sub becomes a mod there automatically. They weren't appointed.

Deleted their oppressive comments that you linked, thx.

2

tanattyn wrote

... oh. Sorry. I just, I get paranoid/hypervigilant after being stalked for weeks by far-right scum on Reddit, and just seeing how deeply and pervasively infiltrated Reddit anticapitalist subs are.

lutherblissett is very consistently TWEF/SWEF, you know. There's probably not gonna be a change of mind with that one. There's even a chance it's Cathy Brennan or Bev Jo or one of their novice nuns-in-street-clothes. They're probably from r/GenderCritical, r/anarcha. This is a coordinated effort, it's a coherent reactionary group now, it's not just a few bored rich white cis lesbians stalking trans women.

2

Defasher wrote

I saw they were debating banning lutherblissett sitewide for being a terf in the raddit telegram. If they keep it up I'll ban them from my subs.

1

ziq wrote

Banning people from subs isn't a feature that's working yet, sorry.

2

ziq wrote

We're handling lutherblissett. Are you SLT from reddit?

3

tanattyn wrote

Endbrocialism. I know I'm too wicked to cross the Jordan with the rest of you, but Goddess damn me if I don't fight the empire hot on your tail until you can cross it yourselves.

1

tanattyn wrote

Goddess save, if only I was a religious right white cishet man (lutherblissett), I could post TWEF/SWEF bullshit, become a mod, and join the other white cishet men teaming up on an unpopular trans woman (me) to sexually harass her, and pathologize her anger at racism (Defasher), on a trans woman's leftist/anarchist-only site.

This is why I gave up on anarchism. IRL white men are the same as far-right scum that pretend to be Marxist/anarchist online, I can't tell some difference I'm supposed to find between them. Their misogyny is almost unchecked, almost like white women are obsessed with encouraging it. If they were - well, radically, different than this, I could believe in anarchy or communism. But no, they want nothing but zero-sum war with women. Their Marxism/anarchism is almost always just a mask for wanting access to more women, like Solanas said for all her other faults. They deserve to be brutally exploited to the maximum possible extent.

2

tanattyn wrote

More like Martin Luther Kisspope, amirite

0

[deleted] wrote

1

tanattyn wrote

I don't use Tumblr, far-right concern troll.

0

[deleted] wrote

1

tanattyn wrote

Tell you what. Let's have this conversation when Janice Raymond doesn't have the institutional power to brutally, massively oppress lumpen women, which happens to always include most trans women.

1

[deleted] wrote

1

tanattyn wrote

You're such a fucking liar, hahaha. What did the Sisters of Mercy do to sex-working women in Ireland? What did they do?

1

tanattyn wrote

You - you realize that feudalism is dying, right? Haha. That, probably by like, 2050, you won't be able to recuperate intersectionally privileged women into feudalist patriarchy by claiming to be radfems? You did that by claiming to be Christians, you know, with its feminist reforms to Jewish law, etc, while you were mass raping and genociding women and the LGBT+ of the lower classes.

Everyone that's gonna use this site has read Caliban and the Witch. Your infinitely anti-feminist politics are not welcome in the far-left/@. [clarified the political delineations]

0

[deleted] wrote

1

tanattyn wrote

Infuriatingly, yes. Because you say that, and then people look at what your camp does, and what y'all don't, do.

The Nordic Model forces pimps and johns to operate in secret. The best way to do that? Sex trafficking. You say you're furthermore against sex trafficking but it's in a very sketchy way. What you describe is forcing women into sex trafficking so that they cannot organize, cannot make economic gains, cannot watch out for each other, cannot operate in public where there is more potential accountability than there is in the secrecy of pure sex trafficking. And then you destroy that industry, porn, etc. Sounds great on its own, but it's the silence after that, that is the most terrifying part. The women and their children are still poor. For whatever reason, the welfare state is not sufficiently providing for them. They have no choice but unpaid labor to men. Their plight is only, solved, by direct and constant dependence on a man - becoming the private property of a man, or a male institution like the church. They are unemployable both by bourgeois industry, and by patriarchy, as a (criminalized) sex worker. Cis lesbians and their children are now dependent on church charity, and on a man whose abuse has been completely empowered by the lack of even broken, terrible, alternatives like sex work. Even the slightest dissidence from women results in extreme suffering. This empowers the church to return the society to an openly brutal, anti-LGBT, and it goes without saying, a lumpen-woman-genocidal regime. Again, the burning times. Your camp, is attacking the bourgeois institutions of women's oppression, in favor of the church. [edit, needed more Caliban]

But if you focus your attack on the church, if you attack the billions of dollars a year that the church, and by extension the non-profit secular charity scams that have adopted their economic mode, the only immediate solution to the communal need, is socialism or a much, stronger welfare state (which fails eventually, so, socialism, ultimately), or a sort of unofficial, localized gift economy. Capitalism has i.e. destroyed the father/family in PoC communities, and as a result, i.e., the Black Panther Party was driven by economic necessity, to start a communal program for childcare, and their efforts resulted in the WIC in the US. Imagine! Lumpen cis lesbians being more often, and moreso, able to raise their children without a man - without a pimp - and without clergy raping them and their children. It's not enough, as I said. Sex work is still something that becomes an economic necessity in lumpen women's survival. But if the church is necessary for communal survival, there is nothing for the lesbian and/or trans woman but purest brutality and need. [edit, a laugh at the welfare-state compromise]

(Waits, amused, for your response.)

1

[deleted] wrote

1

tanattyn wrote

Well, you tried, I'll give you that. No, of course, to all of it. It won't do for me, these tired appeals to some salaried libfem's Madonna complex, I've never enthusiastically consented to sex in my life.

But if we must talk reforms to genocidally misogynist systems, then let's take Israel as a Western-imperial model, not Scandinavia. There, pimps are criminalized, and sex work decriminalized, just the way the vast majority of sex worker advocates call for. Add hate crime legislation, and the minimal rights for sex working women one might gain from capitalism, and ofc more jobs for women and stronger welfare programs. And that's about the furthest you can go, short of socialism or communism.

And there is an institution, in the West (and Russia), that is standing in the way, of socialism and communism. Called, the church. And to a much lesser extent what's left of the nobility, knighting people, Shakespearean plays, etc. And when this feudal property is threatened in modern times, a fascist general always appears, conquers, and reinstalls the church with a reign of terror (see: Franco, "Latin" American anticlerical wars). Thankfully, people are also just very tired of child-rapists in their communities, so they're kind of silently voting by abstention against feudal power by not going to church or giving anymore. And without the church, the bourgeoisie are just inefficient economic planners. [edit, addendum: last sentence, elaboration]

Hence my earlier points, which I am sure are still, by your claim, completely incomprehensible. /s

1

[deleted] wrote

1

tanattyn wrote

Luther-bless-it, you lied, blatantly, in the same comment.

It's the pimps and johns that are the abusers

Worse than pimps, is a system that forces women into the poverty that necessitates sex work.

Description of pimping being illegal, and description of the option of sex work being legal, presented as if bad in and of themselves

Again. You are more terrible than liberal capitalism by being so oppressive to lumpen women, that you don't even want us to have the option of sex work to deal with terrible situations in a terrible way. Which will drive the same section of men that want to brutally exploit women sexually, to increase sex trafficking. You want women's sexual oppression to be Nazi Germany, where the gov't controlled and exploited sex work completely.

1

[deleted] wrote

1

tanattyn wrote

You keep trying, I'll hand you that. You're so removed from the suffering of lumpenized women that you think being economically forced into the sex slave market is more liberating than having the option of looking for men on the street to rape us for money.

If I had a military I would literally install socialism or something more advanced, and then I'd rape captured johns and pimps to death, personally, and I'd create the conditions by which liberated ex sex workers could do literally whatever they wanted with these men until the men were literally genocided. And you're sitting here behind your desk in your church office or whatever saying all this bullshit to entertain yourself, cause you think you're baiting me to say these things. I say them freely and publicly, like you feudalists/fascists voice your genocide fantasies publicly.

Truly you are laboring with all your might to earn yourself a place in the gulag.

1

[deleted] wrote

1

tanattyn wrote

Women are inherently pacifist, men are inherently violent

God, DAMN IT it took you so long to take the mask off. Now I can finally tell you to follow your leader, Nordic Jesus, and crucify yourself.

-1

PoisonDartFrog wrote

They've said they're mentally ill so we should probably cut them some slack. Even though they are very aggressive and prone to misinterpreting people's intent, they do make good points sometimes.