Seems people here oppose to fundamental rights without any discrimination of race, class, creed and area in Pakistan. Can we discuss it?0w0 OP wrote
Reply to comment by JoeMemo in Seems people here oppose to fundamental rights without any discrimination of race, class, creed and area in Pakistan. Can we discuss it? by 0w0
Well, yes but right know there is a state and pressuring it for more freedom is positive. Of course that they should get rid of that, it would be awesome that Pakistani society accept that kind of thinking. But are they in that point now?
JoeMemo wrote
The entire article can be summarized as "the state should really be nicer to us", it's just not worthy of attention.
0w0 OP wrote
Do you reccomend a Pakistani article that says something better?
JoeMemo wrote
Why can't I just downvote a boring article without having to justify it? You post a lot of links, some of them are going to get downvoted sometimes. I don't understand what you expect me to say other than "It wasn't an interesting read".
0w0 OP wrote (edited )
Upvotes are for posts that contribute to the discussion and to the site overall, and are not intended simply to show agreement. Similarly, downvotes are for posts that are not contributing to the discussion or to the site overall, and not simply to show disagreement. That is of course except when explicitly stated, like votes or proposals.
That you didn't find it interesting or you disaggre with the article is not merit to down vote it, I think.
JoeMemo wrote
Similarly, downvotes are for posts that are not contributing to the discussion or to the site overall
But this is exactly why I downvoted your link. You posted a lot of links and only 60% of them were what I'd consider valuable. So downvoting the meh ones is a form of quality control and allows better, more deserving links to stay on the front page longer.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments