[deleted] wrote
r1l3y OP wrote
Thanks for that explination, but then, what does this mean for the site? This is allowing peoples free speech without consequences, which, if what your saying is true, could let people censor other peoples free speech.
Please explain
AlexanderReidRoss wrote
We believe in saying whatever we want. We also believe in taking direct action to shut people up if what they're saying harms others that are less advantaged than them.
r1l3y OP wrote
1st part. yay
2nd part. yes and no. i have mixed feelings about that :/
AlexanderReidRoss wrote
Mixed feelings are good, nothing is black and white like the establishment paints it.
r1l3y OP wrote
agreed. should i delete this post?
AlexanderReidRoss wrote
don't ask permission from anyone to speak.
r1l3y OP wrote
what do you mean? in what context?
AlexanderReidRoss wrote (edited )
you asking me if you should delete your comment because I disagree with it.
[deleted] wrote
r1l3y OP wrote
makes sense.......
Pretty much "free speech and no cancer admin" reddit?
[deleted] wrote
[deleted] wrote (edited by a moderator )
AlexanderReidRoss wrote
that's ableist
r1l3y OP wrote
........
im sorry i cant please everyone..... i was agreeing with you
AlexanderReidRoss wrote (edited )
see the content policy:
https://raddle.me/wiki/terms_of_service
when people use bigoted slurs - that's where the direct action comes in.
r1l3y OP wrote (edited )
oh im sorry.......
internal rage activates
I DIDNT MEAN TO SAY IT LIKE THAT, I WAS JUST SAYING THAT WHAT THE ADMINS DID THERE WAS STUPID.
DissidentRage wrote
Or maybe you need to reflect on why you choose to use ableist terms.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments