Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Fool wrote

I am fine with mutualism as not closing the door on options.

But overall I believe that the problems start with assigning a value to a task or object that persists beyond a momentary event. As such I am more in line with Communist distribution, but I also see no reason why markets cannot be utilised - bring back the definition of market as a meeting place - the mercat square.

So overall I am against economic systems, but I am also against prohibition of economic systems.

I want to write about why Anarchy can only be negation, and cannot be something.

4

fortmis wrote

Bringing back the market as a meeting place really rings with me. I don't think this concept works on a large scale -- and I don't think it should. Meeting place, with emphasis on place as defining the relationship between everyone who meets there. This would mean some big corporation wouldn't be able to participate as they are inherently disconnected from place.

3