Third position fascism and Russian imperialism will not be entertained.
Comments
AnarchoDoom wrote (edited )
Oh we TOTALLY can trust the Ziq for his sharp judgement and trustworthiness on matters of poperly interpreting what is "Russian propaganda" or not. Or else.
/s
ziq OP wrote (edited )
don't you have some refugee corpses to kick, anarchotank?
as for the Ukrainians' land, that is a very debatable political abstraction actually, that is right now being debated through bombings and shootings
just in case anyone thinks i'm exaggerating, this one actually calls an imperialist invasion that includes bombing of maternity wards and mining of refugee corridors and targeting of cultural sites a 'debate'
asg101 wrote
McCarthyism is not dead.
https://jacobinmag.com/2022/03/russia-ukraine-war-invasion-nato-expansion-criticism
ziq OP wrote
when did banning russian propaganda become nato policy? i'm not nato, i'm ziq
ziq OP wrote
or is ukraine daring to defend themselves against the russian rockets, missiles and tanks tearing through their cities 'Western foreign policy'? wtf wtf wtf
lettuceLeafer wrote
Since the ukranian civilians don't defend themself while waving a red and black flag it means they are evil nationalists.
mima wrote
Nah, even if they use a red and black flag they will still be accused as evil nationalists :P
zephyr wrote
anarchists censored by "authority."
ziq OP wrote
When did russian nationalists become anarchists
zephyr wrote
when did an anarchist who might want to provide some factual information about russia become a russian nationalist?
ziq OP wrote (edited )
factual information isn't the issue, warmongering imperialist disinfo is
if you want to defend an imperialist invasion by a far right authoritarian nation state with a ruler who has been in power for 20 years and is mass-arresting protesters and writing laws to throw journalists in prison for using the words 'war' or 'invasion', you're not an anarchist
anarchists aren't a) imperialists b) authoritarians c) defenders of war crimes or d) defenders of putting protesters and journalists in prison
so there's no danger of any anarchist being affected by this new policy, is there?
zephyr wrote
you have given yourself the authority by being the only one to interpret what "russia propaganda" is to ban anyone who has anything to say about russia. that's censorship. i'm not defending anything other than freedom (which includes free speech). anarchists aren't authoritarians but you are acting as one.
ziq OP wrote
Removing authoritarian disinfo from an anti-authoritarian space does not make me an authoritarian.
Theybannedgard0nlol wrote
they've banned me 50 times. They are ban happy and hiding the full extent of it by deleting all opposition
SnowCode wrote
Freedom of association is also an anarchist principle. Also, w/free_speech
hole_a_dig wrote
Dude, you banned people who pointed out you were supporting Ukraine, pointed out you just repeat western propaganda like a parrot unable to make a geopolitical analysis and vote manipulate using your army of pathetic alts.
Fuck both Ukraine, USA and Russia! Spooky bootlicker
ziq OP wrote
says the half-hour old alt who yesterday used a series of identically obtuse alts to attack genocide victims and belittle/downvote/witchhunt me for defending them
it's almost like you're everything you accuse me of being
granite wrote
Ban hammer at Raddle? Starting to feel like reddit/twitter here now. Sad to see that at the least Putin can read, he's definetly using "The Art of War" as a playbook, whilst people whom can't read at all (Biden) can't even find Ukraine on the map.
ziq OP wrote
yea rly, raddle really jumped the shark when it went after our free speech in 2022
let's all go to lemmy
NotAnarchist wrote
Russia is good
ziq OP wrote
funny how the far right (you) are on the same page as tankies on an issue yet again
NotAnarchist wrote
I don't understand, what's so funny about that?
Fool wrote
You just accept that you have the same goal as Marxist-Leninists as though there's nothing strange?
RanDomino wrote
Based