Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

lettuceLeafer wrote

Reply to comment by __0 in by __0

Theres been fentanyl and benzos in like everything locally,

yeah thats what I said.

It doesn't matter what your dealer does. For most of the drugs that can be contaminated aren't made locally. Adulterants are usually added after smuggling and way before your local dealer gets it. This won't help you with any amount of certainty.

You keep saying testing like that gives you any real certainty. Due to the physical smallness of fent the issues of subsampling of subsampling and hot spots make fent testing very unreliable. Same goes with going tothe lab.

Sure if you are disolving all your drug in water then testing it maybe. But like 1 person drinks their MDMA or heroin or whatever. Testing is just odvocacy for people becoming over confident. As tests aren't accurate at telling if your whole dose is fent or benzo free.

So my point is telling people to test their shit is prob more harm than good imo. Things like being around people with naxalone, dose titration and using sources where you can see adulteration. By this I mean if your friends did MDMA rock instead of MDMA pills the issue with adulterants would be way better.

2

__0 OP wrote

Ps my reading comprehension is terrible because i was getting daydrunk on my day off lmao

2

__0 OP wrote

I guess the mdma rock they did was slightly discoloured, was a bad time for everyone involved. Also you’re right about subsampling, and overconfidence too probably …

Although also some dealers do have better sources, some get their stuff pretty much right from a port, and some dealers have really old rave connections, but yeah you really cant trust anything right now.

1

lettuceLeafer wrote (edited )

oh shit it was mdama rock. Huh, there aren't a ton of resources on if crystal drugs like meth can be spiked. I assumed you could visually tell but I could have been just been making up a myth. I take back my previous statement and will stop saying that untill I find good evidence that it is true. But yeah other than that correction we seem to be in agreement.

1

__0 OP wrote

Ok i just decided to link to a drug testing place i know exists … i guess this will give a bit more of an idea of drug contamination, its not local to me but its being run by the university of victoria, and it covers a few small towns, the amount of samples is pretty low so you should take this data w a grain of salt … there is also obviously a bias in the results because often the samples they get are already of suspicious quality…

https://substance.uvic.ca/blog/content/files/2022/10/Vancouver-Island-Drug-Checking-Sep-2022-Monthly-Report.pdf

1

lettuceLeafer wrote (edited )

? I mean I said that one should expect all drugs that could be cut with adulterats are cut with adulterants. So I'm confused. This is a quote from my first comment to you

The stuff that you can get away with filling with adulterats is going to allways have adulterats unless you make it yourself.

1