Submitted by ziq in freeAsInFreedom (edited )
[deleted] wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by edmund_the_destroyer in Richard Stallman: Open Source is Amoral, Depoliticized by ziq
edmund_the_destroyer wrote
Well, I'm being pedantic but I wrote "or if some other Linux contributor thinks Hillary Clinton would be a great president", so I wasn't implying that Stallman supports Clinton. And the Green Party still supports capitalism, they just want more regulation than the Democrats. Stallman isn't a socialist or anarchist.
ziq OP wrote
Too bad he also makes creepy pro-child rape arguments.
[deleted] wrote
ziq OP wrote (edited )
Stallman:
I am skeptical of the claim that voluntarily pedophilia harms children.
Stallman:
There is little evidence to justify the widespread assumption that willing participation in pedophilia hurts children. Granted, children may not dare say no to an older relative, or may not realize they could say no; in that case, even if they do not overtly object, the relationship may still feel imposed to them. That's not willing participation, it's imposed participation, a different issue.
Stallman:
necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia ... should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.
https://stallman.org/archives/2012-nov-feb.html#04_January_2013_%28Pedophilia%29
http://www.michaelridley.info/blog/2006/6/10/richard-stallman-on-pedophilia.html
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments