Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

tanattyn wrote

Eureka! Let's turn atomism into a means of objectifying women's anatomy.

−1

not_AFX_lol OP wrote

With all due respect, how the fuck does this objectify women's anatomy?

4

tanattyn wrote

With all due respect, go fuck yourself.

−2

not_AFX_lol OP wrote

That isn't an answer and you know it.

4

tanattyn wrote

Manbitch. Ask yourself. Do I answer to you? Do I owe you an answer?

−2

not_AFX_lol OP wrote

That depends. Do you want me to stay angry at you, or do you actually want to try to convince me that I'm wrong? Your choice.

4

tanattyn wrote

OH SHIT I'M SHAKING IN FEAR AND SHAME FOR QUESTIONING YOUR AUTHORITY. I'LL BE YOUR QUIET SUBMISSIVE BITCH NOW. PLEASE WHEN YOU'RE NOT MAD AT ME ANYMORE, PLEASE TEACH ME THE PHILOSOPHYS, DADDY.

I'd laugh at you in front of all your manarchist friends, IRL.

−2

not_AFX_lol OP wrote

I'm legitimately confused.

If you can back up the viewpoint that this objectifies women's anatomy then I'll think about taking down the post. The burden of proof doesn't rest on me here, however, and unless you stop slinging ad hominems instead of legitimate criticism I see no reason to change my viewpoint.

3

tanattyn wrote

Do you even libfem, bro?

−1

not_AFX_lol OP wrote

No matter how I respond you would still argue that I am not. So, for the purposes of this conversation, let's assume that I am not, so we can skip to the part where you educate me about your viewpoint and not get bogged down in another pointless argument.

3

tanattyn wrote

Oh oh oh, watch out! Your alpha-meter is dropping toward beta by the second.

−2

not_AFX_lol OP wrote

So you don't want to try to convince me that you're right?

Well, fine, whatever floats your boat.

3

tanattyn wrote

I'm a lesbian.

−2

not_AFX_lol OP wrote

OK cool

that doesn't answer my question but whatever

3

tanattyn wrote

I reluctantly tolerate your lack of desire to "answer my question"

−2

not_AFX_lol OP wrote

Instead of making a legitimate argument to support my assertion I will simply mock and verbally attack you because reasons

3

tanattyn wrote

a fox appears, and speaks to you in a warped voice

Chaos, reigns.

−2

not_AFX_lol OP wrote

All right.

I wouldn't have minded hearing this from your perspective. But it's become quite clear you don't really have one.

Instead, you've chosen to troll and insult me, rather than try to convince me. That, combined with the rather conspicuous downvoting of content posted by anyone you get into a disagreement with, shows that you really don't care about trying to do anything apart from be a veritable fountainhead of negativity and toxicity.

I'm going to ignore you as best I can from now on, although I'm sure many of my posts in the future will carry your little mark of disapproval.

3

tanattyn wrote

fox is now chewing at his own foot, which has been chewed down to the bone in places

−2