RanDomino wrote
Reply to comment by Tequila_Wolf in In the second of my series on why pro-civ people should try harder, let's have a quick look at diabetes. by Tequila_Wolf
Do you think The State = at least one rock placed atop another and therefore Anarchism = not a single rock placed atop another?
LajkaBear wrote (edited )
Anarchism = not a single rock placed atop another?
Correct. Anarchism is when all rocks are flying in a perfectly egalitarian, horizontal manner in the general direction of anybody who suggests that anarchism is a statism with a human face or whatever the fuck you are trying to convey with this really shitty metaphor.
subrosa wrote
What kind of nonsense are you trying to pull here.
Tequila_Wolf OP wrote
I said state-forms, which is a more general political notion including states, denoting any apparatus that seeks to capture relations in a territory and structure them in advance of people's interaction with the territory itself, creating social stratification in that territory.
Churches and other hierarchical institutions would be included among these, but so would any reified ideas, like present-day notions of justice or happiness.
I would rather not say what anarchism is in relation to this, but I do think that anarchists typically are against all state-forms, and we seek to escape structured by them through our practices of prefiguration (organising ourselves with different sets of relations in a territory) and bypass them to destroy them through collective and individual direct action.
If you're having any more trouble, let me know what about, and we could probably recommend you something to engage.
RanDomino wrote
Do you think state-forms = at least one rock placed atop another and therefore Anarchism = not a single rock placed atop another?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments