Submitted by celebratedrecluse in anarcho_capitalism
Aren't these groups quite overlapping? If you aren't trying to create some commons to be shared and drawn sustenance from, which relies on working in concert (if not outright and extensive cooperation)...then you are basically asking people to draw sustenance from the depleted/destroyed natural environment, or from market economies which destroy the natural environment.
ruin wrote
Individualist is too broad for me so I’ll exclude it, but ancaps, mutualists and the like all share the distinction of owing their limited relevancy and scope of discourse to the internet and a small corner of academia. Outside of online spaces, the only anarchists one is likely to engage with are ancoms, and I see ancom as the default ideology associated with anarchism by the general public, at least where I live.
Not saying there aren’t other varieties of “out” anarchists in meat space, but all the agonizing over adjectives seems to happen much less than online. Personally, most people I know (non-anarchists) all identify me as an anarchist, and that’s enough for them and fine with me.