Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

2

selver wrote

The choice of scarjo is just cause they need a big name to push the movie, and there really aren't m/any trans actors that can sell a movie themselves.

I don't think it's offensive (other than the capitalism), they just care about making money. If people want breakout trans actors playing trans characters, they've probably got to go to indie films.

1

autonomous_hippopotamus wrote

There are plenty of trans actors out there, if they want Big Names they can include them in supporting roles. I mean, everything hollywood makes is shit and i suppose that is to be expected, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't criticize them.

3

selver wrote

Scarlet playing a trans character is a way bigger draw though, and probably Oscar bait. They eat that shit up.

There are tons of trans actors that could do it, but Hollywood loves to use the same 30 actors for fucking everything. Fame is all that's really relevant.

Of course it is a symptom of cis-normativity, but it's more just capitalism being capitalism.