Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote

Reply to comment by NOISEBOB in by !deleted8445

There’s an “er” at the end of the second work. Even if you disagree, it is a coherent statement.

−2

NOISEBOB wrote

i'd say its more like an oxymoronic statement, but whatever...

3

BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote

If I were to say that banning coal work is good for coal workers, would that also be oxymoronic? Would it not be correct to say that coal work is very harmful for the coal worker and the environment in which the coal worker lives? Like it or not, the statement is coherent.

−1

NOISEBOB wrote

i'm not against coal-work. i'm against coal-mines.

3

BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote (edited )

Yeah sure, and I’m not against sex-work, I’m against brothels and porn distributors and any other sex-work facilitator. Potato potato.

−1

NOISEBOB wrote

what about sex-worker run brothels and diy porn distribution?

3

BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote

What about coal-worker coop mines and diy coal distribution? I oppose it just the same as I oppose sex-work, on the grounds that it is inherently harmful for the worker and the society.

−1

NOISEBOB wrote

I’m not against sex-work

I oppose sex-work

make up your mind already...

also,

inherently harmful for the worker

its only harmful because we have this concept called PATRIARCHY (that you seemingly adhere to)

2

BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote

I only said I'm not against sex work to prove a point that distinguishing between being against x-work and being against the facilitators and distributors of x-work is meaningless. Is it so hard to read?

−1