Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote

Reply to comment by emma in by !deleted8445

Interesting, I didn’t know this discussion was about women.


emma wrote

If it wasn't, you and your kin wouldn't have turned it into an issue for your twisted brand of feminism to address. You know as well as I that women and femmes are overrepresented in sex work by a long shot.


BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote

My kin? I was not even talking about the issue from a feminist perspective of any kind, and I made sure to only refer to sex-workers as gender neutral because it is, in fact, a gender neutral profession.

Interesting though that you lump ‘femmes’ into the woman category, implicitly denying their nonbinary identities.


emma wrote

I'm not going to play games with you further. Suffice to say, you're calling yourself a radfem for a reason, and if anyone takes issue with my "lumping in" of two distinct categories of people, they can draw a venn diagram for themselves and find out why that isn't the case.


BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote

My bio is very obviously a joke. It has plenty of contradictions and even lists a fiction author for no reason.


emma wrote

There's nothing obviously contradictory about your bio.


BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote (edited )


Neoreactionary ecology


fanged Noumena

Julius Evola

James Joyce

Practically everything on the list contradicts one or more other things on the list, except James Joyce who is just an author. I thought the joke would be obvious.