Submitted by [deleted] in ToSBreaches (edited by a moderator )
Reply to comment by BrowseDuringClass1917 in by !deleted8445
the banning of (...) sex-work is pro sex-work(...)
There’s an “er” at the end of the second work. Even if you disagree, it is a coherent statement.
i'd say its more like an oxymoronic statement, but whatever...
If I were to say that banning coal work is good for coal workers, would that also be oxymoronic? Would it not be correct to say that coal work is very harmful for the coal worker and the environment in which the coal worker lives? Like it or not, the statement is coherent.
i'm not against coal-work. i'm against coal-mines.
BrowseDuringClass1917 wrote (edited )
Yeah sure, and I’m not against sex-work, I’m against brothels and porn distributors and any other sex-work facilitator. Potato potato.
what about sex-worker run brothels and diy porn distribution?
What about coal-worker coop mines and diy coal distribution? I oppose it just the same as I oppose sex-work, on the grounds that it is inherently harmful for the worker and the society.
I’m not against sex-work
I oppose sex-work
make up your mind already...
inherently harmful for the worker
its only harmful because we have this concept called PATRIARCHY (that you seemingly adhere to)
I only said I'm not against sex work to prove a point that distinguishing between being against x-work and being against the facilitators and distributors of x-work is meaningless. Is it so hard to read?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments