Submitted by Heywood_Floyd in Tech

An Idea Whose Time was Never

BADSITES was part of the aftermath of the Daniel Brandt vs.Wikipedia war I need to write about some time soon; at any rate, because Brandt had websites reminding people about the Bomis Babes and all the other more unsavory parts of the Jimmy Wales/early Wikipedia story, "The Cabal" (i.e., the administrative leadership, such luminaries as MONGO, Will Beback, SlimVirgin, Snowspinner [Philip Sandifer], Fred_Bauder, Mantanmoreland [Gary Weiss], und so weiter....) decided to come up with a hidden shite list of websites to be linkbanned and thus BADSITES was born. This was done when Wikipedia was at its highest point, 2006-2007, when it seemed Wiki-inania would be the future and everything was milk and honey, hookers and blow.



You must log in or register to comment.

ikk wrote

This situation is made more complicated by the fact that they've been redirecting links with a Wikipedia referer to their anti-Wikipedia page rather than the particular other pages being linked to

seems quite reasonable to me that wikipedia don't allow linking to a site for references when the server hosting the site is deliberately configured to redirect links away from what they're referencing. also, the repeated nazi comparisons are cringe hyperbole.


Heywood_Floyd OP wrote

Under this system you can't use the Daily Mail (UK) as a source. Wikipedians might not like the politics of the tabloid, but it has been around 126 years.

Daniel Brandt's view of Wikipedia in 2005: His views on Wikipedia and Jimmy Wales have not changed an inch.


ikk wrote

Under this system you can't use the Daily Mail (UK) as a source.

Is Daily Mail redirecting links with referer from Wikipedia to a separate page?

Daniel Brandt's view of Wikipedia in 2005:

Nice article, valid criticisms but entirely different points than the blog post.