Puncture wounds produce high-pitched vocalisations in Homo sapiens (Rose et al.) Submitted by Majrelende on February 4, 2023 at 6:17 PM in Science (edited on February 4, 2023 at 6:17 PM) Last prod, I promise. 6 comments 3
anarresinfoshop wrote on February 4, 2023 at 10:14 PM I don't see the article :( Permalink 4 Majrelende OP wrote on February 5, 2023 at 2:10 AM (edited on February 5, 2023 at 12:12 PM) It is a low-effort joke; I didn't feel like ghostwriting itTheir writing system is beyond our comprehension. Permalink Parent 5 anarresinfoshop wrote on February 5, 2023 at 6:15 AM Oh. Rose. Lol. Yes, I just got this. Permalink Parent 3 roanoke9 wrote on February 6, 2023 at 1:20 PM Cannot be a writing system at all. That would be preposterous. Just meaningless instinct driven scribbles. Permalink Parent 2 Majrelende OP wrote on February 6, 2023 at 10:41 PM (edited on February 6, 2023 at 10:48 PM) It is a joke! Or shall we test it? Put ink on the tips of branches and let them scrape against a board with a piece of paper nailed to it? Or search for letters in the bark? But then that's confirmation bias. The ink-paper option seems better, then. Permalink Parent 3 roanoke9 wrote on February 7, 2023 at 1:50 AM I meant, human writing was preposterous. Following the analogy. Permalink Parent 3
Majrelende OP wrote on February 5, 2023 at 2:10 AM (edited on February 5, 2023 at 12:12 PM) It is a low-effort joke; I didn't feel like ghostwriting itTheir writing system is beyond our comprehension. Permalink Parent 5 anarresinfoshop wrote on February 5, 2023 at 6:15 AM Oh. Rose. Lol. Yes, I just got this. Permalink Parent 3 roanoke9 wrote on February 6, 2023 at 1:20 PM Cannot be a writing system at all. That would be preposterous. Just meaningless instinct driven scribbles. Permalink Parent 2 Majrelende OP wrote on February 6, 2023 at 10:41 PM (edited on February 6, 2023 at 10:48 PM) It is a joke! Or shall we test it? Put ink on the tips of branches and let them scrape against a board with a piece of paper nailed to it? Or search for letters in the bark? But then that's confirmation bias. The ink-paper option seems better, then. Permalink Parent 3 roanoke9 wrote on February 7, 2023 at 1:50 AM I meant, human writing was preposterous. Following the analogy. Permalink Parent 3
anarresinfoshop wrote on February 5, 2023 at 6:15 AM Oh. Rose. Lol. Yes, I just got this. Permalink Parent 3
roanoke9 wrote on February 6, 2023 at 1:20 PM Cannot be a writing system at all. That would be preposterous. Just meaningless instinct driven scribbles. Permalink Parent 2 Majrelende OP wrote on February 6, 2023 at 10:41 PM (edited on February 6, 2023 at 10:48 PM) It is a joke! Or shall we test it? Put ink on the tips of branches and let them scrape against a board with a piece of paper nailed to it? Or search for letters in the bark? But then that's confirmation bias. The ink-paper option seems better, then. Permalink Parent 3 roanoke9 wrote on February 7, 2023 at 1:50 AM I meant, human writing was preposterous. Following the analogy. Permalink Parent 3
Majrelende OP wrote on February 6, 2023 at 10:41 PM (edited on February 6, 2023 at 10:48 PM) It is a joke! Or shall we test it? Put ink on the tips of branches and let them scrape against a board with a piece of paper nailed to it? Or search for letters in the bark? But then that's confirmation bias. The ink-paper option seems better, then. Permalink Parent 3 roanoke9 wrote on February 7, 2023 at 1:50 AM I meant, human writing was preposterous. Following the analogy. Permalink Parent 3
roanoke9 wrote on February 7, 2023 at 1:50 AM I meant, human writing was preposterous. Following the analogy. Permalink Parent 3
anarresinfoshop wrote
I don't see the article :(