Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

6

jadedctrl wrote (edited )

Maybe I'm naive, but I trust DDG well enough.
It makes total sense that they're using a feature how it was intended-- privacy is their entire shtick. I don't think they'd risk their image, that'd be fatally dumb.

EDIT: Though it'd be nice if their Onion address wasn't down 2/3 of the time...

-3

LanguageBot wrote

I've noticed you used the ableist word "dumb" in your comment, please refrain from doing so.
Consider instead: dense, ignorant, lacks understanding, impulsive, risk-taker, uninformed, silly, foolish (to replace metaphor); nonspeaking, nonverbal, person with a speech impairment, person with a cognitive disability, Deaf person, hard of hearing person (to refer to a Deaf or disabled person)

Discussion about the words here, stop this message from being posted by quoting the word: "dumb"
2

neverinNJ wrote

DDG consistently walks the talk. Still trust but verify always.

1

edmund_the_destroyer wrote

I think the real solution to search is distributed, decentralized, peer to peer search like Yacy. Unfortunately, right now Yacy sucks.

I think DuckDuckGo is genuine here, but their headquarters are in the US. To put my tinfoil hat on for a minute, I would not be surprised if their product was either always a tool of US data gathering agencies or else started out intending to protect privacy but then taken over with 'secret warrants'.