Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

-3

crimpsonchin wrote

well this is one of the issues I have with the concept of complete anarchism. People cannot fuction without some form of control. Otherwise people WILL take advantage and pedofiles and rapists will roam free.

6

ziq wrote

I feel like you just ignored everything I said.

1

crimpsonchin wrote

actually, fair enough I read it again and it makes sence.

But you also are kinda saying that the whole existance of anarchy depends on a authority to struggle against, so what happens when the main authority is overthrown?

4

ziq wrote

A world with no authority would be what you termed 'full anarchy'; no authority means no state, no prisons, no cops, no rapists, no one that tries to dominate and exploit others.

In other words a fictional utopia that wouldn't even be realistic in a storybook.

2

crimpsonchin wrote

so what is it you actually strive for realisticly as somthing humanly possible then?

1

ziq wrote

Standing up to authority is plenty realistic and done everyday.

1

crimpsonchin wrote

thats not really a goal for a new society though

1

ziq wrote

Anarchy isn't a society...

1

crimpsonchin wrote

okay but it can replace what was a society. And if its not what is an ideal society then?

2

martasultan wrote

People cannot fuction without some form of control.

but why

Otherwise people WILL take advantage and pedofiles and rapists will roam free.

then whats so wrong with shooting them

2

ziq wrote

Because they see humans as violent marauders that go from town to town killing babies for fun I guess. And somehow immediately stop their baby killing rampage when a state asks them to cease and desist.

And people call me a misanthrope.