Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

3

mofongo wrote

  1. History shows, time and time again, that having a mass line in revolutionary time is inviting the counter revolution in. In no revolutionary times is voting Democrat. Ideology does not being revolution, there's no need to make room to those that feel unaccepted by the demand of acceptance and understanding of those different than them.

  2. Stop trying to modernize the language, bourgeoise and proletariat have precise definitions for a reason. Changing it to haves dilutes what you're trying to say, to focus and infantilize your audience. It's doing exactly the thing you're complaining about.

-2

RedIsNowGreen wrote

The simpler the language used, the easier it is for people to understand.

I'm good with the "HAVEs vs HAVENOTs" paradigm.

But thanks for your feedback.