Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

1

mike425 wrote

Refreshingly balanced article that doesn't pretend that gun control and disarmament will solve the problem of mass shootings, and instead makes the case for having more immediate armed responses to emergent threats.

6

Zzzxxxyyy wrote

How is this balanced?

First, the FBI data only shows that active shooters are increasing, not that armed citizens would help. So the article uses “FBI data” to give credibility to a preexisting bias that’s entirely unsupported by that data.

Then it goes and throws around some numbers without giving any source references.

Then it finishes with the conclusion, that the answer to gun violence is to have more guns and more people training to use them.

I’m sure if mass shootings were down the author would attribute it to armed citizens as well. So the conclusion has nothing to do with FBI data, but a pre-existing bias they wanted to write about.

This article is garbage, written and funded by the gun lobby.

1

mike425 wrote

The article specifically points out that several mass shooting incidents were stopped by armed citizens, and you could find the statistics used with a search engine. The only thing that stops someone that's wielding a tool of force, is someone else that's also wielding a tool of force. Gun Free Zones are the delusion that an imaginary line around a campus is going to keep out someone with the intent to harm.

Your talking points sound like they came straight from the /r/politics CTR circlejerk, who can't understand any solutions outside further restricting access to the wealthy elite right people, and 'Assault Weapons' Bans, because military-style rifles, their standard capacity 30 round magazines, and the people who own them are scary!
We the people are facing systemic corruption and tyranny in government, the likes of which haven't been seen since the 1700's, yet there are crowds that think throwing down our armaments is a wise and prudent decision, because think of the children.

2

Zzzxxxyyy wrote

Yea, so you went from stopping mass murderers to fighting the government. I grew up in the militia culture, nothing you’re saying is new. People who feel insignificant and powerless cling to guns as the answer.

Honestly, the reality of protecting yourself or others with a gun is complete bullshit when you work out how such scenarios would really work out. They’re always predicated on YOU being a rational person choosing the correct target and being prepared at the very moment to kill.

One only needs to look at gun violence statistics in countries with actual gun control laws to realize the pro-gun lobby is lying when they say, “Oh, nothing can be done, so buy more guns!”

Secondly, the US military’s capabilities FAR out match what citizens are capable of. All that needs to happen is for them to stop caring about civilian casualties (e.g. Syria) for them to crush any and all opposition. It’s pure fantasy to imagine any weapon you can personally purchase will help your cause against a degenerate US government fighting its own citizens.

You’re a right wing troll. GTFO

0

mike425 wrote (edited )

I caucused for Bernie, and I've referred to myself as a left libertarian and socialist.
US citizens wouldn't be fighting the military, the military would divide into factions.
You can't knock down my reasonable commentary, so I'm a "right wing troll".
That's so sad I'm not going to waste more of my time responding.

0

betty wrote

When was the last time the US won a war?

0

lrt wrote

The US used to have a Bill of Rights.

-1

newyork wrote

Life may be all fun and games now in the USA, but as offshoring increases, illegal immigration rises, hard-working Americans die off or dropout due to higher taxes and more regulations, the national debt climbs, there is more terrorism as the result of illegal American wars, the police become more brutal enforcing draconian decrees, the US Ponzi economy and stock markets collapse, cash is banned, Americans are implanted with microchips, and real crises and false flags are used to force Americans to go to the gulags and finally to the gas chambers and ovens, will Americans wish that they had spoken out earlier against the dangers of wars, debt, and tyranny?

-2

newyork wrote

Why obey the law if the government and illegal immigrants don't?

-5

lrt wrote

Brown people can't be free, too?

-7

lrt wrote

Americans hate freedom with a passion and beg for their chains.

If our overlords decreed that everyone must buy a new snowblower this year, Americans would agree that the law makes sense and must be obeyed.

When guns are banned, Americans will scream with delight.

If Americans are forced to get microchip implants, Americans would fight to be first in line.

When Americans get sent to the concentration camps, they will insist that they live in a free country as they get pushed into the ovens.

-7

lrt wrote

If Americans should be allowed to be homosexuals then why can't they own guns?

If Americans should be allowed to read Bibles then why can't they smoke marijuana?

Live and let live.

Freedom is the American way.

4

ziq wrote

Freedom is the American way

Oh rly?

I think you mean white supremacy.

0

robottroymacclure wrote

i appreciate your restraint, usually a comment such as this would be all in caps with at least a few dozen exclamations at the end. you must be serious and also probably take your opinions very seriously. you said words. good job!

-1

ConnieCommie wrote

If Americans should be allowed to be homosexuals then why can't they own guns?

this comment made my crops die, my acne come back, and my daughter leave me

i demand a 150-page-essay on lgbt history on my desk in the morning

-1

ConnieCommie wrote

If Americans should be allowed to be homosexuals then why can't they own guns?

this comment made my crops die, my acne come back, and my daughter leave me

i demand a 150-page-essay on lgbt history on my desk in the morning