Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

selver wrote (edited )

Then what's this law for?

In the ordinance, the definition of an assault weapon includes, among others, semiautomatic rifles that have a fixed magazine with a capacity to accept more than 10 rounds of ammunition; shotguns with a revolving cylinder; and semiautomatic pistols and rifles that can accept large-capacity magazines and possess one of a list of other features. Among the dozens of specific models cited are the AR-15, AK-47 and Uzi, according to the ordinance.

Is that wrong? I don't know anything about guns.


zombie_berkman wrote

i read the article wrong i thought they were saying those were assault rifles which legally they arent. also if they are looking for rifles with a fixed mag that take 10 or more that wouldnt be an ar15 because they are detachable. that is unless the state banned that too.

either way to answer your question an "assault weapon" is a meaningless term with no legal definition that capitalist use to scare white moms to disarm the working class.

plus it isnt a ban. if i was rich enough i could pay 250$ a day to keep them