This has advantages & disadvantages, but the advantages are usually felt by those who use a Libertarian Communist rather than a Capitalist System. Say Market A is Capitalist whilst B is Libcom. Their effects will come into effect later. But the rules are kind of astonishing.
if A's resources(R) are more than B's order(O)= A will get an order with change in money(+M) for the profit of the extra R
if A's R are lower than B's O= A will have to make a promisory note(which both asks for other Markets to supplement the deficit if they have the resource AND asks for an allotted time for it's delivery) &OR Pay them the exact price for the deficit.
if A's R=B's O =There will be no Money given to both parties but their Orders are both Satisfied.
Now go back to the sentence before these conditions. The Capitalist Market(A) will use those resources for profit & thus it can fulfill the conditions above. The Socialist Market(B) will use it period. It can be given around for free with the aggregate of the change given to allow it to fulfill the conditions above. You may be thinking this may cause Market B at a disadvantage because they if they do not produce more will make them have to pay some resources in deficit payments but that would be wrong.
The Socialists would actually have more of an advantage because this provides them an incentive to work more. And this overproduction will inevitably shake the Market A with deflation & even bankrupt them. Though both are technically satisfied by their resources, the Capitalists' Workers, having their Purchasing Power lowered, cannot buy the abundance of resources & will eventually start a revolution of their own or will get the Capitalist system overthrown.
This however is just a work in progress & I would like to hear out your opinions in the comments.
Appendix:
Ross was invited to participate in 2005 in the World Poetry Festival of Venezuela, an event backed by the State, where he made public his support to the Government of Venezuela against the imperialist Bush and released a movie documentary in 2008 regarding his experience while in Venezuela, titled Venezuela: Revolution From The Inside Out.
Little by little he distanced himself from that support, as the Venezuelan government made clear its intention developing to the current repressive, statist and centralized government of Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela.
]]>