Submitted by [deleted] in Liberalism
ziq wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted18811 in by !deleted18811
I actually think that the concept can be radically interpreted in the favor of Anarchist praxis.
A "temporary' state..?
How should communities decide upon matters in the absence of democracy?
[deleted] wrote (edited )
ziq wrote (edited )
It does address it or I wouldn't have linked you to it. Now you're just asking me to repeat myself. Here:
"Instead of a large group laboring to make democracy work so they can agree on a course of action, it would be far more productive for smaller groups made up of people with shared interests to splinter off and co-operate to follow their own plans that require no compromise because their interests are already aligned."
I don't know how to make my perspective clearer than that.
you could always just call me a "tankie"
When did I call you a tankie? I just pointed out your argument was no different than the 'withering away of the state' promise.
[deleted] wrote
ziq wrote
How are the smaller groups to come to decisions
By talking to each other.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments