Submitted by existential1 in Green
Just finished reading a collection of Ivan Illych essays, and it really got me thinking. I would say he was definitely in favor of an-prim "light". I'm wondering how technologically intense the "non-prim" solutions are. And if the those solutions are rooted in technology that itself is not sustainable.
foggymorn wrote
Anything rooted in industrial technology isn't sustainable because industry doesn't just sit still, it grows and spreads and destroys everything in its path.
There are no non-anticiv schools of anarchism that have put even an iota of thought into actually ending climate change. They might make vague allusions to 'sustainable' tech (solarpunk) or ridiculous expectations for space mining and uploading humans to the cloud (anarcho-transhumanism) but none of them are based in reality or have any understanding of what it means to really oppose hierarchy.