Recent comments in /f/Fascism

hasbrochem wrote

it would give far-right users control of the largest libertarian subreddit

ah hahahaha! god, that's some funny shit. it's like saying that the water is now poisoned because they found mercury in it though lead has always been there (and now the lead has hurt feelies). fuckin' murikkkan liburtarians. sleep among the fleas, you're bound to host a few.

posing as a libertarian, but were secretly on the left.

fuck you, libertarians are the left you fascist fucking swine. fucking reddit.

5

Tequila_Wolf wrote

Generally it's not officially brigading as much as people interacting with reddit links posted here. In a similar kind of way.

Historically organising raids hasn't had much interest from the community. Also our numbers are generally too small to be doing anything on 4chan.

Fascists have way more recruiting grounds than 4chan.

2

Asshat_Anarchist wrote

Raddle brigades Reddit? For what?

Would organizing a 4chan raid be banned? What if we started loading their POL anti-fash memes and shit? Id imagine if we just start mocking the overt open Nazis the slightly less racist 12 year olds would eventually turn the tides.

Like WAGE CUCK type stuff?

Do I sound like a loser? I mean if enough of us attempt to take over 4chan what could the fascists actually do? That's like their only recruiting grounds.

3

hasbrochem wrote

the comments, though...I bust up anytime I see/hear someone refer to "the Antifa":

I’ve noticed a disturbing trend among the Antifa: categorizing all views that one disagrees with as “alt-right” and reifying it as a unified movement. In doing so, they are giving power to the more sinister agents who would love to have a unified far-right movement in the west (E.G. real Nazis, or the Russian Federation). Is that not the same sort of tribalism that got Drumpf most of his votes?

2

Pop wrote

I agree that they won't crack down on white supremacists as hard as us

but there's been a clear backlash against white supremacist stuff since christchurch

Isn't there a difference in that many States may in fact support these acts,

Agreed that overall many states will, but states are also not singular entities, they're made up of many people, a lot of whom will have a problem with this stuff and be able to make moves

Most liberal and even many conservative racists aren't down with overt / egregious white supremacy and are willing to make real moves against it within their frameworks at governmental levels

Whereas with anarchist potd there is no sympathy from authoritarians at all?

agreed, but the effect I'm talking about is still there

A white supremacist state isn't going to attack the average racist just because there was a racist terrorist attack, but they will absolutely attack normal activists & anarchists if there is an anarchist terrorist attack.

The average racist is very different to an anarchist or activist in that anarchists and activists are active
but 'active' racists like milo and cantwell etc will and are getting backlash presently for their shit

Australia bans Milo Yiannopoulos after his racist comments over mosque shootings

"Crying Nazi" Christopher Cantwell reportedly banned from Gab after post advocated shooting leftists

2

selver wrote

Hm that's an interesting connection to make, I'm not sure how much I agree. Isn't there a difference in that many States may in fact support these acts, or at least support the people tangentially related to the acts, and so they don't crackdown too hard? Whereas with anarchist potd there is no sympathy from authoritarians at all? A white supremacist state isn't going to attack the average racist just because there was a racist terrorist attack, but they will absolutely attack normal activists & anarchists if there is an anarchist terrorist attack.

2

Pop wrote

Fash haven't learned from our propaganda of the deed era around how much harder things get for your movements when people do extreme shit

they don't have enough broad support so far as I can tell

so more moderate places will have to crack down on them (like how facebook just banned more white things)

and their individual links to their broader movements will be exposed in ways that hurt them

4

hasbrochem wrote

Now the fascist, not a fascist at all. They never were, never have been. They are a victim, the supreme one, unrecognized, treated shabbily — who will become a victor, by making the world a just place again, one which recognizes them for the superior and perfect being that they are. They are not a fascist. They are a noble and worthy person, on a just and moral crusade. And that way, they will be recognized as victor, savior, and conqueror. They are a victim on the way to becoming a hero, in their own mind. And in the world they live in, there are only such things — heroes and victims, monsters and saviors, conquerors and conquered. Pure and impure. Inferior and superior.

fuck, this describes more than just a few people I know...

2