Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

ziq wrote

Someone says r/CA's no anprims rule was made by that pedo who shamed 13 year olds into sending her nudes. She also banned people from r/@ for being anticiv for months before being outed as a sex pest.

https://old.reddit.com/r/COMPLETEANARCHY/comments/w49cuq/for_the_love_of_anarchy_read_the_fucking_rules/ih1mbf2/

10

Archaplain OP wrote

yeah i am planning on getting rid of that rule, causes too much confusion. Apparently that rule was made for Kazcynskists and the like but it was too vague and people just understood it to mean anprims. Cant really verify above claim tho.

7

ziq wrote

just delete it, they'll never notice. they're all asleep at the wheel

10

Archaplain OP wrote

its done, hopefully there wont be any confusion now.

9

Potkea wrote (edited )

Since you're mod now, can you ask the others abt bringing back user flairs? (Maybe not now, but after you've been mod there fora while).

r/CA in 2017

I see them while browsing thru the sub's archives but we don't have them now and its infuriating.

2

ChaosAnarchy wrote (edited )

Not to forget it says "primitives", not anarchism-primitivists or anarchism-anti-civ. Would be stretching the rules to ban anarchism-primitivism, but then again, reddit moderators.

5

ziq wrote

there are no non anarchist primitivists. it's always been an anarchist tendency (even tho it's now usually called anti-civ)

w/green_scare covers the history

11

tuesday wrote (edited )

That specific person is insufferable about it, they're on a single person mission to end primitivism on Reddit.

9

ziq wrote

wish i had a reddit account right now. i could get them to admit they're a liberal with just a couple of questions

9

Archaplain OP wrote

oh trust me they are not worth engaging with, its like talking to a wall

8

bloodrose wrote

Oh, they're back with their favorite straw man under their arm. Fun times. It's funny because they're making the argument that an-prims will steal their insulin and another user comes in and is like "yeah, you also need a state to enforce ADA" and the OP doesn't agree to that. So....yeah....kinda inconsistent with their concerns.

3