Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] wrote

Reply to comment by ziq in by !deleted13453

−1

ziq wrote

If you were actually libertarian, and were really a proponent of "libertarian vanguardism" (which is still a bunch of bs doublespeak mind you), you wouldn't be equating your vanguardism with a "party", as you've repeatedly done in this thread. That's pure Leninism.

You also refer to wanting an "organization of the state" and wanting an intellectual elite to educate the lowly masses to maintain the revolution.

When you persist in using authoritarian language like this, you can't be surprised that people will be offput when you claim you're anti-authority. There's nothing libertarian about enshrining an elite group with the power to decide how the workers should behave to maintain the "revolution" (which they also get to define).

All you're doing is parroting Lenin but putting the word "libertarian" in front of all his ideas. Libertarian party, libertarian vanguard, libertarian state. It's empty rhetoric.

And why the fuck are you quoting Lenin; an authoritarian, to define your concept of "libertarian" vanguardism?

3