Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

rot wrote

violence and domination are immoral, therefore we oppose them in all situations

This does not reflect any Anarchist theory besides maybe anarcho-pacifists. Anarchists usually lack the numbers or firepower needed for a large insurrection. Large Anarchist insurrections have happened historically; see Catalonia, Rojava and Makhno's Free Territory.

Anarchism takes the moral categories inherited from bourgeois philosophy and ethics (such as the individual subject, possessor of rights and property, etc) as given, and tries to go beyond them while still basing itself on these categories.

Anarchism is based on a similar theory to marxism. You're somehow confusing liberal ideas of property and rights with Anarchist ideas of freedom from state oppression

Meanwhile, multiple communist parties around the world are at this very moment engaged in protracted revolutionary wars to accomplish the goals of revolution, seizing land, expropriating capitalists, etc.

Mmmm Hhmm...riiiiiiiiiiight

You haven't really argued for Maoism here. Just argued that Anarchism is a purely moral philosophy with no historical backing and somehow 'bourgeois'

4