Recent comments in /f/CapitalismInDecay

Hash_the_Stampede wrote (edited )

In my endless travels to nowhere, I descried a simple pattern: a prophet's wisdom is directly inverse to the legion of followers at their coattails. You have no flock, yet you have cast out my future for all to see. You will have no fame, no acclaim for your beautiful truth, yet the truth remains. Decades after this post and this site are long gone and forgotten, I hope your days remain full of thicc and giant booty. You have earned as much for whispering a warning of days to come. If only knowing fate was the same as changing fate ...


cammie wrote (edited )

If capitalism = bigger booties and thicker thighs then I want more capitalism.

A finger on the lobbyist's hand curls up.

Capitalism now equals bigger booties and thicker thighs, and more heart disease.

Which works great because heart disease will be good for the medical industry, and there won't be so many unproductive old people that can't work. Life will be a nice simple understandable fate of:

living with joy and terror for the first few years

spending your time learning your place for the next two decades

spending your time, as a productive member of society, working for the next four decades

spending ten years dying of heart disease and paying all the savings you scrounged for in the last forty years to maintain a steady state of discomfort until you run out of money and are evicted from the hospital to spend your last days on the street where you are fortunate enough to score some good gear that helps you spend the last moments of your existence dreaming --with at least some comfort-- of big booties and thicker thighs, and trying your best to forget all the spending you had to do along the way...

and GDP will be booming, so winners all round, right :)


bloodrose OP wrote

Wall-E had a very fat-phobic view that the people were fat from sitting and eating too much. This study shows that people in 2006 literally eating the same amount and exercising the same amount as people from 1988 were heavier. This is exactly the opposite of the toxic fat-phobic imagery/message Wall-E had. Wall-E acted like people just needed to return to their planet and exercise again to be better.


bloodrose OP wrote

There’s a meme aimed at Millennial catharsis called “Old Economy Steve.” It’s a series of pictures of a late-’70s teenager, who presumably is now a middle-aged man, that mocks some of the messages Millennials say they hear from older generations—and shows why they’re deeply janky. Old Economy Steve graduates and gets a job right away. Old Economy Steve “worked his way through college” because tuition was $400. And so forth.

We can now add another one to that list: Old Economy Steve ate at McDonald’s almost every day, and he still somehow had a 32-inch waist.

A study published recently in the journal Obesity Research & Clinical Practice found that it’s harder for adults today to maintain the same weight as those 20 to 30 years ago did, even at the same levels of food intake and exercise.

The authors examined the dietary data of 36,400 Americans from 1971 to 2008 and the physical-activity data of 14,419 people from 1988 to 2006. They grouped the data sets together by the amount of food and activity, age, and BMI.

They found a very surprising correlation: A given person, in 2006, eating the same amount of calories, taking in the same quantities of macronutrients like protein and fat, and exercising the same amount as a person of the same age did in 1988 would have a BMI that was about 2.3 points higher. In other words, people today are about 10 percent heavier than people were in the 1980s, even if they follow the exact same diet and exercise plans.

“Our study results suggest that if you are 25, you’d have to eat even less and exercise more than those older, to prevent gaining weight,” Jennifer Kuk, a professor of kinesiology and health science at Toronto’s York University, said in a statement. “However, it also indicates there may be other specific changes contributing to the rise in obesity beyond just diet and exercise.”

Just what those other changes might be, though, are still a matter of hypothesis. In an interview, Kuk proffered three different factors that might be making harder for adults today to stay thin.

First, people are exposed to more chemicals that might be weight-gain inducing. Pesticides, flame retardants, and the substances in food packaging might all be altering our hormonal processes and tweaking the way our bodies put on and maintain weight.

Second, the use of prescription drugs has risen dramatically since the 1970s and ’80s. Prozac, the first blockbuster SSRI, came out in 1988. Antidepressants are now one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the U.S., and many of them have been linked to weight gain.

Finally, Kuk and the other study authors think that the microbiomes of Americans might have somehow changed between the 1980s and now. It’s well known that some types of gut bacteria make a person more prone to weight gain and obesity. Americans are eating more meat than they were a few decades ago, and many animal products are treated with hormones and antibiotics in order to promote growth. All that meat might be changing gut bacteria in ways that are subtle, at first, but add up over time. Kuk believes that the proliferation of artificial sweeteners could also be playing a role.

The fact that the body weight of Americans today is influenced by factors beyond their control is a sign, Kuk says, that society should be kinder to people of all body types.

“There’s a huge weight bias against people with obesity,” she said. “They’re judged as lazy and self-indulgent. That’s really not the case. If our research is correct, you need to eat even less and exercise even more” just to be same weight as your parents were at your age.

The exercise part is perhaps one area where Old Economy Steve doesn’t have an edge. A membership at one of the newfangled fitness centers of 1987 would go for about $2,800 per year in today’s dollars, and that’s still what it costs today.


masque wrote (edited )

NewNew, a start-up in Los Angeles, that describes its product as creating a “human stock market.”


Courtne Smith, the founder and chief executive of NewNew, said the company was “similar to the stock market” in that “you can buy shares, which are essentially votes, to be able to control a certain level of a person’s life.”

We are inching closer and closer to just reintroducing chattel slavery, hidden by a veneer of "disruptive innovation."