Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

lettuceLeafer wrote

Only slightly related to the meme I do wonder about all the ultra violence. Like I don't get it. For most people shooting like at all doesn't make sense to make your life more free. Like the world is pretty big but killing government officials will end your freedom pretty quick. Even in the age of the pirates they could only pull off that kinda behavior for like 20 years and even at that time it only worked for a short period.

So I feel like this ultra violence is more of a fetish than something that will help make you free. Not to mention how in plenty of times shooting is hard to do in the a spur of the moment and compensating for other people around. And if people ar willing to kill innocent civilians to fulfill their goal of violence for fun the line between cop and anarchist isn't very thick.

4

moonlune wrote

all the ultra violence

what ultra violence are you talking about? most of what I see is property damage (not violence) and larping online. It's been ages since leftists have seriously tried to kill anybody.

And if people ar willing to kill innocent civilians to fulfill their goal of violence for fun the line between cop and anarchist isn't very thick.

most of the time the call to violence isn't against innocent civilians and is more similar to self defense than cops.

8

lettuceLeafer wrote (edited )

I was referring to said violence killing civilians on accident which is quite typical with violence in densely populated urban areas or just with people around in general. So my point is if children or people just living their lives are are acceptable incidents to attack your enemy or whatever the logic of the police is quite similar.

3

moonlune wrote

ok but when did that last happen? Are you talking about preventing future accidents?

7

lettuceLeafer wrote

Innocent people being hurt is a guarantee of violence. Anarchy are aren't special in this regard. If gangsters, people shooting in self defense and cops alike often end up accidentally killing civilians. Anarchists doing the same thing will have the same problem.

I was trying to avoid bringing it up because I couldn't think of a nice way to say it but you don't notice the obvious because what u require for proof is ridiculous. It's like u don't understand that violent criminals actually don't release proof of them commiting crimes publicly. and if they would get caught it's not like cops have a specific stats for recording the political beliefs of violent offenders.

Like the writer of pistols drawn or whatever isn't going to stream themself assassinating someone on Instagram while holding their ID to prove. You want the anarchists to be larping so you believe it. Because frankly your level of evidence required to prove something is incredibly unlikely of happening because anarchist criminals usually have pretty good security culture.

4