Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

3

ConfettiEggnog wrote

Name the states where the government does not restrict far more than "only restricts certain kinds of speech that might cause violence"

-1

Somebody_somewhere wrote

What, just because it doesn't exist, that means it shouldn't?

2

ConfettiEggnog wrote

It only restricts certain kinds of speech that might cause violence

that implies there is such a state that "only restricts... bla bla bla" could you name it?

0

[deleted] wrote (edited )

0

ConfettiEggnog wrote

So my statement implying that "states do restrict more than violent speech" becomes a "a state that only restricts violent speech should not exist". Wow!

0

Somebody_somewhere wrote (edited )

Well, sorry. I thought you were someone else replying to my first post, because I saw it in the inbox. My original point still stands.