Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

0

Somebody_somewhere wrote

Except, no. The state doesn't grant you that right. It only restricts certain kinds of speech that might cause violence. "Your right to swing your fist ends where my face begins."

3

ConfettiEggnog wrote

Name the states where the government does not restrict far more than "only restricts certain kinds of speech that might cause violence"

-1

Somebody_somewhere wrote

What, just because it doesn't exist, that means it shouldn't?

2

ConfettiEggnog wrote

It only restricts certain kinds of speech that might cause violence

that implies there is such a state that "only restricts... bla bla bla" could you name it?

0

[deleted] wrote (edited )

0

ConfettiEggnog wrote

So my statement implying that "states do restrict more than violent speech" becomes a "a state that only restricts violent speech should not exist". Wow!

0

Somebody_somewhere wrote (edited )

Well, sorry. I thought you were someone else replying to my first post, because I saw it in the inbox. My original point still stands.