Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

2

darsa wrote

'Brocialist' is a lot smoother, I'm going to stick to that.

3

RedEmmaSpeaks wrote

That's what I prefer to use even if it doesn't cover the full nature of anarchist beliefs. Let's just agree that smug White boys who patiently lecture women and minorities about how they simply have to ignore their concerns for the sake of the Revolution, suck and are, at times, more irritating than the Far Right Fuckwads. At least, the fuckwads don't pretend to care about you. Regardless of what we call them, we must not forget this.

1

ziq wrote (edited )

A lot of (m)anarchists aren't socialists. That's why we have 2 words (brocialist for marxists / social anarchists and manarchist for anarchists).

2

darsa wrote

They aren't? What the hell are they, ancaps?

2

ziq wrote (edited )

Just anarchists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individualist_anarchism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-left_anarchy

Social anarchism is a more recent development; blending socialism with anarchy.

1

ziq wrote

A lot of people shy away from social anarchism because of how workerist it is. Anticivs, for example, see industry as the root problem facing society; so embracing industrialist communism would be illogical.

3

darsa wrote

Fair enough, we need a better term than 'manarchist' then, yeah. I don't know individualist anarchism or post-left anarchism very well.

2

Freux wrote

I don't think the term socialist or anarchist should be attribute to those people, at the end of the day they are neither. Unfortunately I have no idea what would be a better word for it.