Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

-4

OKC wrote

No I said capitalism or communism.

5

ziq wrote

The USSR wasn't communist, it was state capitalist which is an even more hierarchical and unequal form of capitalism than 'free market' capitalism.

0

OKC wrote

Citation needed...

5

Dumai wrote

what would you call an economic system predicated on wage-labour, generalised commodity production, and capital?

none of that changes just because most industries and sectors are state-owned or otherwise state-controlled.

-3

OKC wrote

It's communism if the workers own the means of production.

4

Dumai wrote

... which they patently didn't in the ussr, so what's your point?

i mean you could make the argument i suppose that the kolkhozy were legally cooperatively owned as opposed to the state-owned sovkhozy, but in practice kolkhozy were so tightly controlled that there was functionally little difference between the two in their managerial structures

-4

OKC wrote

It's funny how your argument for communism always comes down to <<that wasn't REAL communism>> lol

If there was never real communism then you're just a book club.

6

Dumai wrote

well i'm not a communist so don't look at me

it's just kind of a plain fact of political economy that capital prevailed under the ussr /shrug

5

jadedctrl wrote

It's funny how your argument for communism always comes down to <<that wasn't REAL communism>> lol

“It's funny how your argument for Communism always comes down to facts coming from even a basic understanding of Communism lol”

If there was never real communism then you're just a book club.

So any idea that hasn't been put into long and tangible practice is bullocks to you? You should think more often, friend