ziq OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by sudo in Is raddle discriminating against sex workers by excluding pornographic content from the site or is this person just trolling? by ziq
It was proposed in meta, voted on and passed. I made sure that non-pornographic nudity would still be permitted when I added it to the ToS.
An_Old_Big_Tree wrote
I haven't managed to find it either - all I've found is the conversation linked at the bottom of the w/terms_of_service - this one - which isn't great. More was definitely said about it, since I think I remember voicing my reservations then. Must be deleted?
sudo wrote
Must be. I don't remember seeing the proposal, though, since I would have cast a "nay" vote on it. Maybe it was voted on and deleted when I was away for a few days, or maybe it was proposed somewhere other than /f/meta. I don't know.
An_Old_Big_Tree wrote
I've looked for a while though and it's likely been deleted. Seems like it should be readdressed. Somebody making a proposal then us collectively working on amending it sounds good.
ziq OP wrote
I also remember talking more than that. I voiced my reservations and made the point that banning nudity would be a bad idea because what about femen protests and art and etc.
ziq OP wrote
Idk. If you check the tos it might list the date I added that rule, which might make it easier to find. Duckduckgo site:raddle.me porn rule brought back too many results to be worth slogging through on mobile. I can't remember who made the proposal.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments