Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

5

sudo wrote

I've heard of the Less Wrong guy and his fanfictions, but never looked into them. I do remember him getting into a giant controversy for supporting cryogenics, which is a known pseudoscience.

It seems like the domain of /f/rational is already covered by /f/skeptic, which could really use some more subscribers. In fact, I think I'll make some posts there on cognitive biases and critical thinking over the next few days.

2

lambda wrote

Do you mean cryonics? I wouldn't consider that a pseudoscience, but it still seems to be more hopeful than proven at this point (still need to demonstrate that vitrifications is actually reversible).

Cryogenics has to deal with freezing while cryonics has to do with vitrification which replaces water with a different substance (avoids the issue where water expands when frozen which kills cells).

2

sudo wrote

Yes, I did mean cryonics. Sorry for confusing the two.

After reading up on the subject, I would agree that it's not really a pseudoscience, since they never really claimed to be scientific. But it makes too many assumptions, and it's far too costly for it to be feasible as of now. Maybe some time in the far future, when we have a hope of solving all the problems that prevent us from re-animating the dead, it could be a good idea. But not now.

1

lambda wrote

I'm hoping that it turns out to be legit and we start vitrifying all humans (and probably some other animals with intelligence) until medical science catches up enough to fix our medical issues. It'll be hard to make it affordable without more people knowing that it exists, though.