Comments
lenin_1917 OP wrote
Just got a question - how does Raddit work to eliminate reactionaries and liberals from its base? Do we have a banning system in place? I run a few decently-sized subraddits and would be horrified to have the fash attacking my precious /lenin
DeathToAmerica wrote (edited )
So far the admins have banned all the reactionaries that have popped up within minutes. The site guarantees it'll remain a reactionary-free space.
Mods will also be able to ban people from their subs soon, but the code for that isn't ready yet. Right now, mods can only delete posts/comments.
lustysociety wrote
You might take care to avoid the impression that raddit.me is dominated by persons who miss no opportunity to express disdain for white persons and white rich normal men in particular.
ziq wrote
What on earth is a 'normal' man?
lustysociety wrote
DeathToAmerica wrote
You're literally calling queer people 'deviant' now, wtf is wrong with you?
ziq wrote
Liberalism, fam. It's a plague that few recover from.
ziq wrote
Holy shit...
DeathToAmerica wrote
But that would attract white rich 'normal' men to the site, we don't want that.
lustysociety wrote (edited )
That is my point.
I wonder what is the wanted community for raddit.me.
No policy against discrimination or hate against normal white persons.
Content Policy
Content is prohibited if it
Promotes white supremacy, homophobia or heterosexism, transphobia or cisgenderism, misogyny or patriarchy, classism, ableism, body shaming, antisemitism, Islamophobia, colonialism or age discrimination.
Sexualizes minors or promotes adults having sex with minors.
Trivializes or makes light of rape.
Apologizes for police or military brutality, imperialism, eugenics, genocide.
Apologizes for violence towards children.
tlckl wrote
Nothing is really "hateful" against white people in that policy. I'm white, and I don't think I'm the only one. But the thing is that we're not the people who need anti-discrimination measures for our race. If this was an alternative reality, where whites were enslaved and fucked over by Africa, it would be totally different, but look around, it's not like that.
voodoosoviet_twitch wrote
Someone actually wrote a young adult novel like that when hunger games was all the rage. It was basically the hunger games, but ever skin colour was named after a mineral, black people were called "Coals" and ruled society and the protagonist was this little white slave girl called a "pearl".
The author tried to say that they werent racist.
ziq wrote
lmao, that sounds like a fash's nightmare.
lustysociety wrote (edited )
You wrote:
Nothing is really "hateful" against white people in that policy.
I wrote:
No policy against discrimination or hate against normal white persons.
As most might have guessed, I am white too.
The laws against discrimination protect all persons where I live (West-Europe).
Of course I do not need any policy protection from a (virtually unknown) website that is moderated and visited by unabashed radical racists.
So you too think that two wrongs make a right.
AlexanderReidRoss wrote (edited )
unabashed radical racists.
Idk, I wouldn't call you a radical tbh. Just a plain old racist.
ArbitraryHuman wrote (edited )
"Of course I do not need any policy protection from a (virtually unknown) website that is moderated and visited by unabashed radical racists. So you too think that two wrongs make a right."
If you'd like to see an actual website that is moderated and visited by unabashed radical racists, I suggest you take a trip down to Stormfront (A.K.A. Nazi heaven). You seem to be under the impression that either you are being discriminated against because of your race, or that you are merely extremely worried about it happening in the future. The first, if I am correct in my guess, is completely incorrect. I am not discriminating against you because you're white, nor are anyone else. If you believe that just because we criticize your suggestion on discrimination policy on this site that we are somehow discriminating against you, it'd be better if you left Raddit now. This is not a Maoist site, this is not an AnCom site, this is not a LibSoc site. This is a radical leftist site. That means that we accept all forms of radical leftists, and believe me when I say that many of the different forms do not get along well with each other. Criticism is inevitable, and if you can't handle that...well, I'll leave the conclusion up to you. If my second guess is correct, please see below:
"Plus, if they [white people] are on this site, odds are that they've realized this fact [that they're highly privileged] already and are trying to escape it. It would be simply idiotic, if this was the case, for anyone to pour hate or discrimination onto them, seeing as they're actively trying to work towards an egalitarian vision that would in essence negate the very nature of their privilege in a new society. It would be like an AnCom hating Kropotkin for coming from a royal family. Such hate and discrimination, being by necessity of its existence on this site fanatic and illogical, would not require laws for a swift punishment (while indeed not official in its capacity) to be enacted."
DeathToAmerica wrote
Cishet whites don't need special protections you insufferable clown.
ziq wrote
What discrimination? You mean like f/EatTheRich? Does that sub hurt your little feelings?
ArbitraryHuman wrote (edited )
"Normal white persons" are already quite privileged enough as it is. Plus, if they're on this site, odds are that they've realized this fact already and are trying to escape it. It would be simply idiotic, if this was the case, for anyone to pour hate or discrimination onto them, seeing as they're actively trying to work towards an egalitarian vision that would in essence negate the very nature of their privilege in a new society. It would be like an AnCom hating Kropotkin for coming from a royal family. Such hate and discrimination, being by necessity of its existence on this site fanatic and illogical, would not require laws for a swift punishment (while indeed not official in its capacity) to be enacted. White rich men, on the other hand, will always be railed against, seeing as it is their riches that confine the rest of the world to starvation and poverty, a crime that we as radicals cannot accept.
kropotqueer wrote
"normal white persons"
are you a troll or are you just a really warped reactionary?
kropotqueer wrote
You are human garbage.
lustysociety wrote
Is tanattyn back?
ArbitraryHuman wrote
It's very interesting that you respond only to the one comment that provides no backing for itself. Should we therefore assume that this is an indirect admission of defeat?
ziq wrote
The way a lot of us have been doing it - create a controversial post here, wait for it to get a good discussion going, then link it elsewhere.
If you find an article that has the potential to go viral, copy paste the entire article into your post so that you can link to the raddit post instead of the original article on twitter/facebook/reddit/etc.
Examples:
https://www.reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/6gs78e/gal_gadot_supports_apartheid_and_massmurder_but/
https://www.reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/6flbpe/in_the_90s_7_million_russians_drunk_themselves_to/
https://www.reddit.com/r/veganarchism/comments/6b1y6j/should_we_be_using_the_word_rape_when_talking/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/6flrxv/why_we_left_reddit_a_faq_and_introduction_to/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/6dz7g6/toward_antianticiv_revised_article_with_commentary/