161 wrote
If I was in the US no doubt I'd own a gun, but nothing a child could operate (so no handguns) and not a weapon of mass destruction (so no assault rifles)
sudo wrote
Assault rifles are not weapons of mass destruction.
Dirtbagleftist wrote
What about guns like the AR-15 which aren't assault rifles, but can be modified to effectively function like one?
161 wrote
Nope. I mean, I don't know much about guns, tbh. But there's no reason anyone needs to have an assault rifle, any more than they need to have a suicide vest or a nail bomb
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments