Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

161 wrote

If I was in the US no doubt I'd own a gun, but nothing a child could operate (so no handguns) and not a weapon of mass destruction (so no assault rifles)

1

sudo wrote

Assault rifles are not weapons of mass destruction.

2

Dirtbagleftist wrote

What about guns like the AR-15 which aren't assault rifles, but can be modified to effectively function like one?

1

161 wrote

Nope. I mean, I don't know much about guns, tbh. But there's no reason anyone needs to have an assault rifle, any more than they need to have a suicide vest or a nail bomb

2