Submitted by Gwen_Isilith in AskRaddle
This question/thought is mainly inspired by the ongoing "dunking" on pro-democracy anarchists (which yes sure they suck) where I don't see as much discussion of more complex/less explored topics.
To pose my own answer to my own question (while still leaving room for other responses):
It seems it is much easier for one to critique others (especially a common enemy) then to critique oneself or others in one's immediate surroundings. In other words, it's easier to dunk on the redditers as others, then to critique other raddle users or even ones own position.
lettuceLeafer wrote
? More through provoking less discussed topics are talked about a lot on raddle. It is in a bit if a down turn due to the major people I would have nuanced post left discussion with r gone. I think raddle has a good mix.
If you are really concerned you can provoke said discussion and quite a few people will engage u. It's just more difficult to do that so inherently easier discussion to come up with happen more. You can just spew out nuanced hot takes at an industrial pace it takes a lot of energy so it will just happens less.