DarkArmillary wrote
Reply to comment by DarkArmiIIary in OK Bookchin by zoochotic
Nah, one of my major criticisms is with the ideologues, who put ideology and group-think above critical thinking, actual material concerns, and empathy. The result tends to be toxic and repulsive, as seen on this very site.
Also I wonder if the mods will have the decency to shut down your impersonator account...?
[ u/bloodrose ]
7b48dfb784360de35598f8dd3 wrote
People on this site seem pretty into anarchism as a philosophy as far as I can tell so what ideology are you taking about?
DarkArmiIIary wrote
He's got some nice deflections, huh?
DarkArmillary wrote
u/nousername, I wish people on this site were into anarchism as a philosophy, and could, for instance, discuss values and explain their reasoning. But most seem to rely on it as Ideology, sometimes with an almost cult-like fervor (which is itself a sign of Ideology).
Philosophy is dynamic and critical; Ideology is static and dogmatic.
Philosophy is wide-ranging and dialogical; Ideology is narrow and prescribed, leading to a demanding and authoritarian groupthink. It can, and does, happen within anarchism.
Philosophy is the very movement of thought; Ideology calcifies and stultifies thought.
7b48dfb784360de35598f8dd3 wrote
most seem to rely on it as Ideology
Ok like where or how?
DarkArmiIIary wrote
Word salad, yummy yummy.
shanc wrote
Not a bad post tbh. We'd all do well to follow your advice here, and you'd do well to follow your own advice too.
[deleted] wrote
DarkArmiIIary wrote
It's my kink.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments