Submitted by Peter_J_Kropotkin in Anarchism
Like how fascists became white nationalists became alt-right became identitarians became..?
Comments
Peter_J_Kropotkin OP wrote
If I knew the answer I wouldn't need to ask the question. If I can't ask questions on a message board, then why have message boards? We could just have wikipedia.
An_Old_Big_Tree wrote
Because the way that you ask the question has included making judgements of 'reactionary' about something you admit you don't know about. So, is it reactionary or do you not know about it?
Peter_J_Kropotkin OP wrote
If their real beliefs are anarcho-primtivism? Of course.
An_Old_Big_Tree wrote
So, based on a inimical urbandictionary post that clearly reflects no genuine attempt to understand the position, you both know nothing and know enough to call it reactionary, likening it to how nazis have rebranded to the alt-right. You don't seem like you're trying to understand anything. You seem like you've already made your decisions. Is that clear to you or are you just a troll?
Ok I'm done with you. If anybody wants to ban this person for the class-reductionism that suits me fine. I gotta get some work done.
Peter_J_Kropotkin OP wrote
I'm simply demonstrating that primitivism is not a popular ideology with anarchists. It's strange that I need to explain that here.
L0rdEMPRESS_GaLaXyBrAiN wrote
You're blowing a lot of hot air.
L0rdEMPRESS_GaLaXyBrAiN wrote
Says the reactionary calling me ableist for pointing out my family members were force fed drugs.
L0rdEMPRESS_GaLaXyBrAiN wrote (edited )
Bad faith, but somehow I'm the troll.
insurrectobot wrote (edited )
is "ancom" just the new re-brand of "state communism" so they can hide their real authoritarianism that thankfully in the present era has only managed to manifest itself in the form of virtual historical reenactment societies and workerist revolution cosplay tendencies?
ziq wrote
oh snap
L0rdEMPRESS_GaLaXyBrAiN wrote
The truth hurts.
ziq wrote
Pretty much. Anprimitivism accumulated a lot of ideological baggage over time (read: collectivism) so it needed to be taken back to the basics.
L0rdEMPRESS_GaLaXyBrAiN wrote
Go back to Lemmy.
An_Old_Big_Tree wrote
No. Why not read up on it? You seem underinformed about these questions in the same way that liberals are underinformed about anarchism, thinking it's mere chaos, etc.