Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Majrelende wrote

If a wealthy class is threatening the majority with servitude or starvation, it’s freedom. If one person downvotes another because they say something hurtful or useless or otherwise, it’s slavery.

6

jabber OP wrote

I don't agree with that at all. Threatening people and forced slavery isn't freedom. Work has to be voluntary. You can choose to work without pay if you want (for food, protection and board), but if it's voluntary it's not slavery.

1

rational_ancap wrote

as an anarcho-capitalist (to the uneducated that means I am a bastion of facts, logic and reason), me and my voluntary slaves™ wholeheartedly agree. They voluntarily serve me 24/7 in exchange for food, water and "protection" (from me, lmao), because I own the only well in town. I even own the only farmland in the area, I love voluntarism.

6

Bezotcovschina wrote

No one is silencing you yet.

3

jabber OP wrote (edited )

I just saw there are moderators here and it's not voluntary... I didn't agree to a contract with the moderator so they have no right to police me.

In anarchism, we can choose who we want as our boss, it's all voluntary, but here there's no choice because as soon as we make an account we have no power. We have no way to opt out of being moderated by these people, it feels just like a state.

Moderation need to be voluntary, if a moderator tries to censor me, they should have to get my permission first and if I refuse they can't do it.

0

pixxa wrote

So is capitalism.

2