Submitted by BlackFlagged in Anarchism (edited )

https://archive.fo/U8vgu

They start their shitty essay about how anarchists need to stop ragging on China because the US is worse with "We Anarchists..." but if you look at their post history, they repeatedly identify as a Marxist and make all kinds of authoritarian arguments. r/@ has been filled with this kind of blatant entryism this year. Most of them are smart enough to use alts that they only use to pose as anarchists while promoting auth ideology but this one didn't even bother:

https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/csqtyq/china_isnt_socialist/exgorza/

They don't understand dialectics, but really they never cared to understand it. The social Democrats are just another tool the capitalist class uses to maintain control. China is different in exactly the way you put it - they see dengist reforms as a tool to progress society towards it's higher state. As Marxist we understand capitalism gives birth to socialism and we must remember that for the proletariat to succeed we must not let policy be dictated by the wishes of great men with great aspirations for a better world but by constant evaluation of the material conditions and it's contradictions.

5

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

shanc wrote

higher state

no

1

ziq wrote

They're rly bad at psyop

https://www.reddit.com/r/Anarchism/comments/ct2z9o/where_do_we_stand/

Comrade I want to learn why I'm not capable of supporting people waving the flag of the imperial oppressors that for so long have caused countless deaths through direct violence, exploitation and economic warfare. This is America's record why should I side with either one and why do some believe one side is so clearly the right one. I do not see it, enlighten me.

Forcing people to accept their bogus terms; that all 2 million protesters are agents of the US.

Please comrade argue with me on the points I'm making , tell me what am I missing. This whole HK episode has me confused.

Classic concern trolling.

1