Comments
chokingvictim wrote (edited )
-petr kropotkin
ziq wrote
emma goldman actually
ploopt wrote
Ursula K. Le Guin said that she didn't deserve to call herself an anarchist. She may have meant that there were people who deserve to call themselves anarchists, but I also think this points towards the paradox inherent in the beautiful idea. Of course there are no anarchists - we all live in the "real" world. The world of compromise and defeat.
We might be, in some ways, lucky that the revolution in Spain was defeated by the fascists rather than succumbing to bureaucracy and internal power jockeying. There is no capital-A Anarchism as historical embarrassment to apologize for. We remain a constellation of tendencies that sometimes align and sometimes don't, plucky underdogs that can continually experiment and reinvent ourselves.
ziq wrote
A+++ comment.
Majrelende wrote
What makes you an anarchist?
I am trying to change our society by dismantling authority and authoritarian culture.
Why do you deserve to be called one?
I was issued a Certificate of Ideological Purity by the local Bureau of Anarchism.
ziq wrote
Fuck.
They keep denying me my certificate even though I took the test 5 times now.
TOPE OP wrote
What is peak bootlickery?
TOPE OP wrote
What are you?
TOPE OP wrote
Do you have a link to it?
TOPE OP wrote
What is the difference between anarchist and egoist?
TOPE OP wrote
What about wikipedia convinced you to be this?
ziq wrote
Mostly human.
ziq wrote
I oppose authority in all its forms.
I don't.