1_6_1_manc wrote
Reply to comment by An_Old_Big_Tree in How does anarchy look in a world in the midst of collapse and mass extinction? by ziq
Getting your hands on some land, setting up some kind of resilient forest garden type of situation, a reliable water-source, and a renewable energy situation if you like.
Wouldn't a setup like this just be seized by what was left of the state?
An_Old_Big_Tree wrote
Deserter spaces are usually picked for being spaces that capital is largely uninterested in. More can be read about this is the two short sections of Desert starting here.
Not far from where I live, there are already places largely abandoned by capital and authority. Places with little to no functional water system, no real industry, nothing to mine. The land is a arable but nothing special and since there's not much water it's not a good investment to get involved in farming there. Interesting things could be done.
1_6_1_manc wrote
The land is arable
If it stays that way, I'd expect capital to move in before long. I don't have the references at hand, but there's a chapter in Desert where they talk about previously forgotten land (in the far north mostly) becoming more and more desirable over time, with disastrous consequences for the people currently living there (Inuit, deserters, etc)
An_Old_Big_Tree wrote
I doubt that it will in my lifetime; it's an increasingly abandoned space.
I think the tougher thing will be finding stuff to grow there as the heat increases.
ziq OP wrote
My land is north facing and shaded by mountain, worthless to farmers who are still operating from an obsolete rulebook. They take one look at it and scoff. But north facing land is the only land where everything doesnt need to be planted in huge shadehouses to survive the summer.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments