Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

blog wrote

You mean me? I don't think China is socialist, sorry, I don't owe it to you to conform to your manichaean worldview where everyone who isn't with you 100% is just a red fascist

−1

ziq OP wrote (edited )

You mean me?

if you're the one who posted those 6 tankie memes and then used alts to upvote them

2

blog wrote (edited )

No, but you did call me a concern troll a few times so I wasn't sure.

−2

ziq OP wrote (edited )

you were the only one defending those troll memes and you made an account just to 'ask questions' in defense of those memes. concern trolling 101

plus you lied through your troll teeth in saying this:

you started whining about how dare I ask questions about moderation policy here

looks like a duck walks like a duck

2

blog wrote (edited )

You're also mischaracterizing what happened. I only commented on a single meme, and I don't think I was really defending the meme. I found the bit playing up soviet aggression distasteful. But there was also a criticism I agreed with in the one single meme, in the singular number, which I actually commented on. Namely, although the original meme presented a garbled version of events, RIAU's flawed monetary policy, which indeed was a monetary policy, which is demonstrated by looking at their own proclamations, although that discussion probably belongs in the other thread.

I asked: if the bit about the soviets was cropped out could this be acceptable for discussion? And you were absolutely incredulous that I'd ask the question as my first post on here and just kept repeating your incredulity over and over. After the second time it certainly seemed like whining that anyone would take the time to criticize mistakes by people you like.

I think criticism of historical anarchists and their specific choices certainly can be separated from apology for tankieism.

I definitely did not submit the memes, whatever you may like to think.

−2