Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BADC wrote

I saw the games up there and just thought that I should stick to business now. So here we go; the next stage of breaking through.

Potemkin villages are fine. We are not in Potemkin times.

This article only scratches the surface. We are in a nuclear weapons world, a surveillance world now. In "Anarchy Works" (over there btw >) all of the successful anti-state groups formed up and went to the land. They didn't go work as a wage slave; a community was formed by the community and for the community. The compromises were voted on. The compromises were made at the edge of the group; not within it.

Over time it will be harder to go to the land. We have to get moving now, no more endless debate please. We need real things to get seeded from Raddle into our communities. If we focus on this we can live together and learn empirically from everyday anarchist living. A real tangible problem turns into a debate that makes real world decisions for us.

There will be crazy people and people you don't like in the community. That's normal. Problems do not get fixed by making assumptions and calling people names. People do not use a full measure of respect. That's not good. These same people whine when they get threatened for their stupidity. There are very, very serious anarchists out here; especially the crypto-anarchists. Violence is still a part of anarchism. I don't like it. It is just how it is; I'm not validating it for the future use of a true anarchist society.

AI is going to cause a war. Be prepared. It is going to be grueling.

−1

BigG wrote

There are very, very serious anarchists out here; especially the crypto-anarchists

You have to care about bitcoin to be a serious anarchist?

4

LanguageBot wrote

I've noticed you used the ableist word "crazy" in your comment, please refrain from doing so.
Consider instead: wild, confusing, unpredictable, impulsive, reckless, fearless, lives on the edge, thrill-seeker, risk-taker, out of control

Discussion about the words here.
0

BADC wrote

language bot isn't in control so it can't be out of control; like me.

−4

LanguageBot wrote

I've noticed you used the ableist word "stupid" in your comment, please refrain from doing so.
Consider instead: uninformed, reckless, impulsive, ignorant, risk-taking, risky and dangerous, dipshit

Discussion about the words here.
0

BADC wrote

language bot is a dipshit idea. there

−3