Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

3

ziq wrote (edited )

In the past I would have filled the comments section here with a heated back and forth between Chomskyist and Defasher to illustrate the deficiencies of a moralist position in an easily digestible and entertaining format.

I can't do that any more so just use your imagination to see how that conversation would have unfolded.

8

retiredshared2 wrote

You could still, just write it like a play.

enter CHOMSKYIST, DEFASHER

CHOMSKYIST: blah blah blah

DEFASHER: not blah blah blah

exit CHOMSKYIST

7

retiredshared2 wrote

In the past I would have filled the comments section here with a heated back and forth between Chomskyist and Defasher to illustrate the deficiencies of a moralist position in an easily digestible and entertaining format.

Making a faux debate makes it very open to strawmen and is just a bad idea overall. Don't recommend.

6

noordinaryspider wrote

I thought this was very well written and it clarifies some issues I have been having with language, not with amoralism itsself.

Thank you.

More please.

1

ziq wrote (edited )

But this also serves to demonstrate how we are controlled and limited by others 'morality'.