ziq OP wrote (edited )
In the past I would have filled the comments section here with a heated back and forth between Chomskyist and Defasher to illustrate the deficiencies of a moralist position in an easily digestible and entertaining format.
I can't do that any more so just use your imagination to see how that conversation would have unfolded.
retiredshared2 wrote
You could still, just write it like a play.
enter CHOMSKYIST, DEFASHER
CHOMSKYIST: blah blah blah
DEFASHER: not blah blah blah
exit CHOMSKYIST
retiredshared2 wrote
In the past I would have filled the comments section here with a heated back and forth between Chomskyist and Defasher to illustrate the deficiencies of a moralist position in an easily digestible and entertaining format.
Making a faux debate makes it very open to strawmen and is just a bad idea overall. Don't recommend.
ziq OP wrote (edited )
But this also serves to demonstrate how we are controlled and limited by others 'morality'.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments