Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

2

happysmash27 wrote

Do you have a better suggestion? Antarctica seems by far the cheapest. What could go wrong anyway? Environmental problems would hopefully be addressed by simply not doing anything that destroys the environment, such as having coal power plants or running trains through habitats not on bridges or in tunnels. Being sustainable is very important to me, at least. I don't think I submitted that as a proposal for a guideline, though. Maybe I should…